Statistical evaluation of the function of the 1992 International Continence Society Scientific Committee.

Papers submitted to the International Continence Society are read by the six members of the scientific committee, who assign three scores to each paper, one for its originality, one for its scientific value, and one for its academic or clinical interest. Following discussion at the scientific committee meeting, a program is made from the abstracts with the highest scores. In this study statistical properties of the assigned score values for the 1992 ICS meeting are discussed. It is concluded that the three scores do not measure independent properties of the abstracts, that different abstract types (for instance "clinical" and "basic" papers) are scored differently by the different committee members, that there is a significant consensus among the committee members, that the scientific committee meeting has a relatively small effect on the scores, and that different abstract types are not equally represented in the final program.